Yesterday, I [somewhat] objectively made a set of 10 predictions I expect to see over 2009′s course. However, what I expect and what I’d like to see are two very different things, so I thought I’d complement yesterday’s list with a wishlist of my own. Here are five things I think would contribute to social media’s value for myself and others.

#1: More automation.
We’re getting there with devices like the Eye-Fi card and the upcoming Fitbit, but we can do even better: I want to see services and technology that limit the time I’m required to actively spend uploading, sharing, and tagging content. I don’t ever want to see a Flickr upload screen again, choose tags for my online video, manually share my location on Brightkite, and so forth. If it can be digitally “outsourced,” I want that option. That’s why services like Tagcow appealed to me so greatly when they first emerged– I want to be able to spend more time creating and discussing great content than preparing and labeling it for the Web.
#2: Fewer options.
In a way, I’m fortunate that the tech economy is forcing companies to rethink their strategies and limiting the number of new startups because, as far as I’m concerned, there are much too many similar services in the same space. Take a look at FriendFeed’s supported import list, for instance– most web users probably only know a quarter of the items on that list. I don’t like this because the more spread out users are over different sites, the more effort I need to go to to engage with those users. If you wanted to visit all of your old college friends, for instance, you’d have to spend weeks traveling across the corners of the globe to meet up with all of them. The way users are scattered all over the net mirrors this difficulty, it doesn’t solve it, and it’s time for this to change. [click to continue…]
{ 4 comments }

My perfect FriendFeed: a response to Paul Buchheit
by Andy DeSoto on January 5, 2009
I thought about this offer and realized my dream for FriendFeed is simple, even if abstract: I want to be able to sum up what the service does in a sentence or two and share this with my friends.
Now, when researching this request, I discovered FriendFeed actually does have a very abbreviated explanation, as delineated on its About page:
Unfortunately, I’ve found the user experience is not quite as simple. Sure, being a FriendFeed user entails what’s described above, but it’s a lot more complicated than that. In order to successfully navigate the noisy waters of FriendFeed, you’ve got to navigate amongst the treacherous shoals of FriendFeed’s most popular ego-memeiacs, master the imprecise art of hiding sources and friends-of-friends, and more– FriendFeed’s raw power detracts from its ability to meet its well-defined mission statement.
I need to know what FriendFeed is and why I should be using it. When I log in, there are immediately too many choices to make: I can scroll through my feed, peruse the “Best Of” categories, check up on specific friends, read content, comment on it, or merely “like” it, and so forth– it’s the sort of thing that takes too much focus.
[click to continue…]
{ 0 comments }