A few minutes ago I sat down at my computer, opened my browser, loaded Plurk, and planned to write a short update about how I wasn’t feeling particularly cheery at that moment. But then I paused. “Wait a minute, Andy,” I thought, “is this the place to be getting personal? Is Plurk the vehicle to be getting detailed about why I haven’t had a great evening?” I shook my head, decided against it, and posted to Pownce instead.
As I thought about why I had decided to post to Pownce instead of Plurk, it slowly dawned on me: There isn’t yet a precedent of being honest, personal, or emotional on Plurk. In the few days the service has been available to mainstream users, I had a hunch there had been few posts on an emotional or personal level. Was this the case? Since Plurk allows users to filter by a set of verbs, I selected the most emotional ones (“wishes,” “loves,” and “feels”) and looked through the timeline for updates containing these words.
As I suspected, extremely few updates took advantage of these verbs. As I scanned through the public timeline, I noticed a bunch of trivial updates: one Plurker sharing the movie he was watching, another linking her latest blog post, a third rejoicing over a newly-acquired dancing banana. Rarely was there an honest-to-goodness post about a bad day at work, falling in love with a classmate, or sharing a fantastic day with the kids. As a result, I felt uncomfortable adding my own more personal thoughts and feelings in the Plurk timeline.
At first I considered whether or not this was a problem. True, web services adapt to fill certain roles, and maybe there’s a deep-seated need within the internet community for a (more reliable) platform for sharing these trivial updates. The thing is, though, Plurk is a social network, which means it can only be as strong as the relationships between its users, and the unfortunate truth is that emotional and personal updates help found and strengthen these relationships. Without a precedent for honest disclosure, I worry about the service’s staying power.
Plurk has a lot going for it. It’s reliable, fun, and different in a good way, but similar in a way we’d expect, too. However, these advantages bring with them a set of cons, as well: the whimsical look and feel of the site, short-form nature of the updates, and emphasis on quantity over quality (viz. the Karma system) detract from the requisite humanness of social networking websites.
My gut feeling: Right now, Plurk is the one-night stand of the social networking world. In order for it to be any more, it’s got to help me feel more connected to other human beings. And it’s not.
What do you think? Does Plurk seem a little too impersonal and sterile for your liking, too? Or am I making mountains out of molehills? And another thought: Why has Twitter never seemed so impersonal? Back me up or call me out by leaving a comment. You’ll help test out my new Disqus implementation while you’re at it!
(Need to know more about Plurk? Start by checking out these resources, or jump in headfirst by joining up today!)
If you liked this article, you might also enjoy:
- Other social networks to try besides Facebook My blog feed passes by a captive audience of my Facebook friends every time I publish a new post. To...
- Social network pruning heuristic #2: Eliminate cross-posters Fortunately, the solution is simple, albeit time-consuming: take a few minutes to unfollow any individuals that repeatedly send the exact...
- Why follow people you don’t know on social networking sites? I am curious to hear why you think it's a good idea to follow or not follow internet contacts, whether...
Tagged as:
emotions,
feeling,
impersonal,
loving,
Personal,
plurk,
pownce,
reliable,
twitter,
wishing
Emotions make social networks meaningful
by Andy DeSoto on June 9, 2008
Image via Wikipedia
A few minutes ago I sat down at my computer, opened my browser, loaded Plurk, and planned to write a short update about how I wasn’t feeling particularly cheery at that moment. But then I paused. “Wait a minute, Andy,” I thought, “is this the place to be getting personal? Is Plurk the vehicle to be getting detailed about why I haven’t had a great evening?” I shook my head, decided against it, and posted to Pownce instead.
As I thought about why I had decided to post to Pownce instead of Plurk, it slowly dawned on me: There isn’t yet a precedent of being honest, personal, or emotional on Plurk. In the few days the service has been available to mainstream users, I had a hunch there had been few posts on an emotional or personal level. Was this the case? Since Plurk allows users to filter by a set of verbs, I selected the most emotional ones (“wishes,” “loves,” and “feels”) and looked through the timeline for updates containing these words.
As I suspected, extremely few updates took advantage of these verbs. As I scanned through the public timeline, I noticed a bunch of trivial updates: one Plurker sharing the movie he was watching, another linking her latest blog post, a third rejoicing over a newly-acquired dancing banana. Rarely was there an honest-to-goodness post about a bad day at work, falling in love with a classmate, or sharing a fantastic day with the kids. As a result, I felt uncomfortable adding my own more personal thoughts and feelings in the Plurk timeline.
At first I considered whether or not this was a problem. True, web services adapt to fill certain roles, and maybe there’s a deep-seated need within the internet community for a (more reliable) platform for sharing these trivial updates. The thing is, though, Plurk is a social network, which means it can only be as strong as the relationships between its users, and the unfortunate truth is that emotional and personal updates help found and strengthen these relationships. Without a precedent for honest disclosure, I worry about the service’s staying power.
Plurk has a lot going for it. It’s reliable, fun, and different in a good way, but similar in a way we’d expect, too. However, these advantages bring with them a set of cons, as well: the whimsical look and feel of the site, short-form nature of the updates, and emphasis on quantity over quality (viz. the Karma system) detract from the requisite humanness of social networking websites.
My gut feeling: Right now, Plurk is the one-night stand of the social networking world. In order for it to be any more, it’s got to help me feel more connected to other human beings. And it’s not.
What do you think? Does Plurk seem a little too impersonal and sterile for your liking, too? Or am I making mountains out of molehills? And another thought: Why has Twitter never seemed so impersonal? Back me up or call me out by leaving a comment. You’ll help test out my new Disqus implementation while you’re at it!
(Need to know more about Plurk? Start by checking out these resources, or jump in headfirst by joining up today!)
Tagged as: emotions, feeling, impersonal, loving, Personal, plurk, pownce, reliable, twitter, wishing